Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Canopy Architecture Affects Light Interception in Sweet Cherry Your

Authors: null Jingjin Zhang; null Ruilong Luo; null Patrick Scharf; null Matthew Whiting; null Qin Zhang;

Canopy Architecture Affects Light Interception in Sweet Cherry Your

Abstract

Canopy light interception is fundamental factor contributing to horticultural crop performance and quality. No studies have evaluated light interception of modern fruit tree architectures such as compact fruiting walls. Herein we report on daily trends in Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception in sweet cherry trees trained to vertical (upright fruiting offshoots (UFO)) and angled (Y-trellised) fruiting wall architectures using a new developed mobile sensor system. PAR levels at ca. 35 cm above the soil surface were determined every 2 hours on one day in early July 2011 from 0700 to 1900 hr, and compared with levels under clear sky. Two North-South rows from each architecture were tested. The average of daily light interception (LI%) by the canopies for ‘Y’ trellised trees was 82%, higher than that for UFO, 60%. Difference between architectures increased between sunrise and noon from 4.6% to 51.4%, and then decreased to 3.5% at sunset. Further, UFO architecture had greater variation of light interception throughout the day than Y-trellised architecture did, with standard deviations 0.28 and 0.093, respectively. Our results suggest that, for Y-trellised architecture, light interception values between 900 HR and 1100 HR, or between 1500 HR and 1700 HR are representative of daily interception. For UFO architecture, the representative light interception values are between 900 HR and 1100 HR, or 1300 HR and 1500 HR.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!