Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND ECONOMICS OF SOIL CEMENT FEEDYARD SURFACING

Authors: null David B. Parker; null Joey E. Mehlhorn; null Michael S. Brown; null Stefan C. Bressler;

ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND ECONOMICS OF SOIL CEMENT FEEDYARD SURFACING

Abstract

Soil cement, a compacted mixture of soil and portland cement, has been used successfully in the past for surfacing roads and airports. Hard surfacing is being evaluated by open-lot beef cattle feedyard owners as a means to improve manure quality and increase animal performance. In this research, the engineering properties and economics of using soil cement were evaluated using Amarillo fine sandy loam, one of the most common granular soils in the Texas Panhandle region. Soil cement specimens were prepared in compaction molds to determine the optimum moisture content and cement content for compaction. Specimens were subjected to field conditions including exposure to manure for nine months, then subjected to unconfined compressive strength tests, freezing-thawing tests, and wetting-drying tests. The unconfined compressive strength of soil cement increased linearly with cement content between 5 and 20 percent (R 2 =0.99). At a cement content of 7.5 percent, the specimens disintegrated when exposed to field conditions for nine months, while the specimens at 15 percent cement stayed intact. Exposure to manure for nine months did not affect unconfined compressive strength or mass lost during freezing-thawing and wetting-drying. The total cost for installing a 15 cm thick soil cement surface was estimated to be $8,110 per pen. The annual breakeven cost at a discount rate of 8% and payback period of five years was $2,031 per pen. Based on documented benefits from related research, potential returns of $5,200 per pen might be realized from improved animal performance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!