
AbstractAnthropology departments in universities and museums do not always have a staff member trained in flintknapping. This can be problematic because aspects of flaked stone technology can be difficult to illustrate to students and the public without replicative demonstrations. Fortunately, there has been a recent florescence of flintknapping videos on the website www. YouTube.com. This phenomenon allows educators to expand, cost-free, their pedagogical arsenal by bringing flintknappers of all skill-levels "into the classroom." Here we describe the advantages and disadvantages of using YouTube flintknapping videos in an educational setting. While there are ethical issues to consider, YouTube ultimately offers unique possibilities to enrich and enliven the teaching of prehistoric lithic technologies.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
