
In response to concerns about the credibility of many published research findings, open science reforms such as preregistration, data sharing, and alternative forms of publication are being increasingly adopted across scientific communities. Although journals on giftedness and advanced academic research have already implemented several of these practices, they remain unfamiliar to some researchers. In this informal conversation, Kendal Smith and Matthew Makel discuss how they came to know and use open science practices, the values of open science, benefits and objections, and their future aspirations for open science practices in gifted education research. Their conversation aims to help make open science practices more understandable and actionable for both early career and established researchers.
bepress|Life Sciences|Research Methods in Life Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Educational Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Meta-science, bepress|Education|Educational Psychology
bepress|Life Sciences|Research Methods in Life Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Educational Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Meta-science, bepress|Education|Educational Psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
