
Religious analyses of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) usually examine the theological, eschatological, or ecclesiastical elements of Garvey's vision or those of the UNIA. These approaches relegate the religiosity of Marcus Garvey to ideological frameworks and overlook the ritualistic behavior, dress, and colonial symbolism deployed by Garvey and within the UNIA. This article shifts the focus from an ideological analysis to a history-of-religions model that compares religious aspects of Garvey and the UNIA to those of Melanesian Cargo movements. As understood in the history of religions, Cargo movements reflect how colonized peoples religiously negotiate the dehumanizing effects of colonization. This comparative approach allows for an analysis of the myths and symbols deployed by Garvey and within UNIA, which identifies these religious acts as processes concerned with addressing the traumatic effects of being colonized.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
