<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This brief summarizes the results of a gender impact evaluation study, entitled Incentives to learn, conducted between March 2001 and March 2002 school year in Kenya. The study observed the impact of merit scholarship program on adolescent girls in Kenya on the student level. Girls who were eligible for the scholarships had significantly higher test scores than comparison schoolgirls. The effect size was about 0.2 to 0.3 standard deviations. Teacher attendance also improved significantly in program schools. There were positive externalities on girls who started off with low baseline scores who had little chance of receiving the scholarship. There is evidence that the scholarship program did not reduce intrinsic motivation. Funding for the study derived from the World Bank and the MacArthur Foundation.
330, externalities, Education, merit scholarships, externalities, Education, merit scholarships, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:O15, jel: jel:I21
330, externalities, Education, merit scholarships, externalities, Education, merit scholarships, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:O15, jel: jel:I21
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 339 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |