Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Circulation Cardiova...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Natural History of Paradoxical Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

Authors: Frédéric, Maes; Jamila, Boulif; Sophie, Piérard; Christophe, de Meester; Julie, Melchior; Bernhard, Gerber; David, Vancraeynest; +4 Authors

Natural History of Paradoxical Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

Abstract

Background— Up to 30% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS; indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) present with low transvalvular gradient despite a normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Presently, there is intense controversy as to the prognostic implications of such findings. Accordingly, the aim of the present work was to compare the natural history of patients with paradoxical low-gradient (PLG) or high-gradient (HG) SAS. Methods and Results— We prospectively studied 349 patients with SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were categorized into HG-SAS (n=144) and PLG-SAS (n=205) according to mean transvalvular gradient (mean gradient >40 or ≤40 mm Hg). Primary end points were all-cause mortality and echocardiographic disease progression. To evaluate natural history, patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were censored at the time of surgery (n=92). During a median follow-up of 28 months, 148 patients died. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed better survival in PLG-SAS than in HG-SAS, both in the overall population (48% versus 31%; P <0.01) and in the asymptomatic subgroup (59% versus 35%; P <0.02). In asymptomatic patients, Cox analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, left atrial volume, and mean gradient as independent predictors of death. Finally, at last echocardiographic follow-up, PLG-SAS demonstrated significant increases in mean gradient (from 29±6 to 38±11 mm Hg; P <0.001). Conclusions— Our study indicates that PLG-SAS is a less malignant form of AS compared with HG-SAS, because their spontaneous outcome is better. We further demonstrated that patients with PLG-SAS are en route toward the more severe HG-SAS form, because the majority of them evolve into HG-SAS over time.

Keywords

Male, Stroke Volume, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Echocardiography, Doppler, Ventricular Function, Left, Aortic Valve, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    85
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
85
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
bronze