
doi: 10.11575/prism/28073
handle: 11023/4061
Previous research has investigated the effectiveness of implicit and explicit instructional methods on second language (L2) learners’ grammatical accuracy. However, there is a scarcity of studies focused on the effects of the two teaching methods on L2 learners’ pronunciation. To fill this gap, the present thesis examines the effects of implicit and explicit instruction on the pronunciation of beginner learners of German. One group of learners was taught pronunciation explicitly (i.e., using phonetic rules), another group—implicitly (i.e., without phonetic rules), and a third group received no pronunciation instruction. A pretest-posttest design was used to measure learners’ improvement in accent and comprehensibility. No significant difference in progress was found across the three groups. The findings suggest that learner variables might be better predictors of improvement than the type of instruction. Moreover, not all pronunciation features were equally relevant for L2 learners’ comprehensibility. The results have implications for L2 pronunciation teaching.
Teaching, Literature--Modern, phonetics, explicit, Education--Adult and Continuing, methodology, Education--Bilingual and Multicultural, German, Language--Modern, accent, Education, comprehensibility, Learning, Literature--English, implicit, pronunciation, Education--Higher, Literature--Germanic, Language
Teaching, Literature--Modern, phonetics, explicit, Education--Adult and Continuing, methodology, Education--Bilingual and Multicultural, German, Language--Modern, accent, Education, comprehensibility, Learning, Literature--English, implicit, pronunciation, Education--Higher, Literature--Germanic, Language
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
