<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The University of New Hampshire set out to inaugurate a Faculty Instructional Technology Summer Institute (FITSI) addressing the pedagogical principles that support the successful integration of instructional technology into teaching and learning. After a survey of existing programs at other institutions, we developed a model grounded in the widely acclaimed research of Chickering and Gamson detailing the "Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education" (1987) and Chickering and Erhmann's subsequent work, "Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever" (1996), which further developed Chickering's theory by applying the seven principles to the field of instructional technology. The primary purpose of the Institute was to provide faculty with the theory, research, and hands-on experience necessary to explore and implement innovative technology-based learning solutions in their classrooms.During the development and implementation of the Institute, we identified five best practices that can help other institutions plan similar faculty development initiatives. These can be summarized in the acronym GO FOR IT!:Gain support for the program, Organize your resources, First pedagogy, then technology, Offer an incentive, Review and evaluate your efforts, Instructional Technology!This paper will expand on the design and implementation of our Institute model and analyze the effectiveness of these five best practices in the light of initial evaluation data from Institute participants.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |