
doi: 10.1111/sms.12141
pmid: 24283413
Athletic excelling capability in a specific sport results from the combined influence of hundreds of genetic polymorphisms. The aim of the current study was to characterize athletes' polygenetic scores. We developed two polygenetic scores: (a) Power Genetic Distance Score based on two polymorphisms (PGDS2; ACEI/D, ACTN3C/T) or five polymorphisms (PGDS5; ACTN3C/T, ACEI/D, IL6‐174G/C, NOS3T/C, AGTMET235THR); and (b) Endurance Genetic Distance Score based on two polymorphisms (EGDS2; ACEI/D, ACTN3C/T) or five polymorphisms (EGDS5; PPARGC1AGly482Ser, PPARAintron7G/C, PPARDT294C, NRF2A/C, HIFC/T). Eighty‐two power‐speed athletes, 87 endurance athletes, and 119 nonathletic controls participated in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. Power‐speed athletes' mean PGDS2 (46.1) and PGDS5 (29.4) were significantly higher compared with their mean EGDS2 (36.4) and EGDS5 (23.1; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively); and compared with controls' mean PGDS2 (36.6) and PGDS5 (24.2; P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively). Endurance athletes' mean EGDS2 (60.3) and EGDS5 (35.3) were significantly higher compared with their mean PGDS2 (26.9) and PGDS5 (21.8; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively); and compared with controls' mean EGDS2 (51.2) and EGDS5 (26.1; P < 0.05, P < 0.001, respectively). We conclude that polygenetic scores can differentiate power‐speed from endurance athletes. Whether these scores may be used to identify elite power‐speed or endurance athletes' needs to be addressed in future studies.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Genetic Markers, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Adolescent, Track and Field, Athletic Performance, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Case-Control Studies, Physical Endurance, Humans, Female, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Genetic Markers, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Adolescent, Track and Field, Athletic Performance, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Case-Control Studies, Physical Endurance, Humans, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
