
doi: 10.1111/ppa.12058
A large‐scale survey was carried out to study the host range and genetic diversity of A pple chlorotic leaf spot virus ( ACLSV ) in various R osaceae species, with a special emphasis on ornamentals and wild shrubs. Samples were tested by DAS ‐ ELISA using two different antisera, and RT ‐ PCR amplification of part of the CP gene. There was generally a poor correlation between the results obtained with the two sets of serological reagents and between serological and molecular detection assays. Using a nested RT ‐ PCR assay developed here, ACLSV was found to be widespread among cultivated, ornamental and wild species of the R osaceae. The virus was detected for the first time in plum, wild cherry, C rataegus monogyna , P runus spinosa and P runus cerasifera in Greece. Sequences of a part of the CP encoding gene and the 3′ untranslated region from ACLSV isolates originating from various wild species and ornamentals were compared to those of isolates from cultivated hosts, showing similar divergence levels. Further phylogenetic analysis using the sequenced region indicated that the isolates from wild or ornamental hosts were not more closely related to each other than to isolates from cultivated hosts. The possible role of different factors in the spread of ACLSV on cultivated, ornamental and wild species is discussed.
[SDV.OT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT], 570, [SDV.OT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT], serological diversity, wild and ornamental species, host range, genetic diversity, 630, evolution, Rosaceae
[SDV.OT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT], 570, [SDV.OT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT], serological diversity, wild and ornamental species, host range, genetic diversity, 630, evolution, Rosaceae
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
