
AbstractLeptocybe invasais an insect pest causing gall formation on oviposited shoot tips and leaves ofEucalyptustrees leading to leaf deformation, stunting, and death in severe cases. We previously observed different constitutive and induced terpenes, plant specialized metabolites that may act as attractants or repellents to insects, in a resistant and susceptible clone ofEucalyptuschallenged withL. invasa. We tested the hypothesis that specific terpenes are associated with pest resistance in aEucalyptus grandishalf‐sib population. Insect damage was scored over 2 infestation cycles, and leaves were harvested for near‐infrared reflectance (NIR) and terpene measurements. We used Bayesian model averaging for terpene selection and obtained partial least squares NIR models to predict terpene content andL. invasainfestation damage. In our optimal model, 29% of the phenotypic variation could be explained by 7 terpenes, and the monoterpene combination, limonene, α‐terpineol, and 1,8‐cineole, could be predicted with an NIR prediction ability of .67. Bayesian model averaging supported α‐pinene, γ‐terpinene, and iso‐pinocarveol as important for predictingL. invasainfestation. Susceptibility was associated with increased γ‐terpinene and α‐pinene, which may act as a pest attractant, whereas reduced susceptibility was associated with iso‐pinocarveol, which may act to recruit parasitoids or have direct toxic effects.
Eucalyptus grandis, attractant, Plant defence, plant defence, Wasps, Attractant, Plant Tumors, Repellent, Animals, GC–MS, Disease Resistance, 580, repellent, Eucalyptus, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Terpenes, NIR, Plant Leaves, Near‐infrared reflectance (NIR), Gall wasp (Leptocybe invasa), GC-MS, Plant Shoots
Eucalyptus grandis, attractant, Plant defence, plant defence, Wasps, Attractant, Plant Tumors, Repellent, Animals, GC–MS, Disease Resistance, 580, repellent, Eucalyptus, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Terpenes, NIR, Plant Leaves, Near‐infrared reflectance (NIR), Gall wasp (Leptocybe invasa), GC-MS, Plant Shoots
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
