Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Marine Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Marine Ecology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Comparison of epiphyte algal assemblages on the leaves of marine seagrasses Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile, Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Asch, and the lessepsian Halophila stipulacea (Forssk.) Asch in Chebba (East of Tunisia)

Authors: Lotfi Mabrouk; Mounir Ben Brahim; Amel Jebara; Imed Jribi;

Comparison of epiphyte algal assemblages on the leaves of marine seagrasses Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile, Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Asch, and the lessepsian Halophila stipulacea (Forssk.) Asch in Chebba (East of Tunisia)

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to investigate biometric parameters and epiphytic algae on the leaves of three seagrass species Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, and Halophila stipulacea, which co‐occur in Eastern coast of Tunisia (islet of Kaboudia, Chebba). Sampling was conducted at six stations (5 m depth) during March 2017. Biometrical measurements showed that shoot density and leaf surface area of P. oceanica and the C. nodosa were higher than those of H. stipulacea. Epiphyte covers were correlated with biometric parameters of the three host plants. Epiphyte algal assemblages were more abundant and more diversified on the leaves of P. oceanica and C. nodosa than those on the leaves of H. stipulacea. Significant differences were found for all epiphytic algae groups among the three seagrass species. Seagrass species characteristics (meadow type, shape forms of leaves, life span, and growth rate) seem to be responsible of these dissimilarities in epiphytic algae communities. No apparent negative interactions of H. stipulacea with P. oceanica and C. nodosa have been observed. No invasive epiphytic algae species were found on the leaves of H. stipulacea. It seems that it is a recent installation of H. stipulacea in this area since its density (average 416.23 shoot m−2) was relatively low.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!