
doi: 10.1111/jeb.13665
pmid: 32557922
Abstract It is commonly observed that plant species' range margins are enriched for increased selfing rates and, in otherwise self‐incompatible species, for self‐compatibility (SC). This has often been attributed to a response to selection under mate and/or pollinator limitation. However, range expansion can also cause reduced inbreeding depression, and this could facilitate the evolution of selfing in the absence of mate or pollinator limitation. Here, we explore this idea using spatially explicit individual‐based simulations of a range expansion, in which inbreeding depression, variation in self‐incompatibility (SI), and mate availability evolve. Under a wide range of conditions, the simulated range expansion brought about the evolution of selfing after the loss of SI in range‐marginal populations. Under conditions of high recombination between the self‐incompatibility locus (S‐locus) and viability loci, SC remained marginal in the expanded metapopulation and could not invade the range core, which remained self‐incompatible. In contrast, under low recombination and migration rates, SC was frequently able to displace SI in the range core by maintaining its association with a genomic background with purged genetic load. We conclude that the evolution of inbreeding depression during a range expansion promotes the evolution of SC at range margins, especially under high rates of recombination.
Inbreeding Depression, Plant Infertility, Models, Genetic, Plant Dispersal, metapopulation, Self-Fertilization, colonization, migration, Biological Evolution, self-compatibility, Baker's law, selfing, dispersal, reproductive assurance, inbreeding depression
Inbreeding Depression, Plant Infertility, Models, Genetic, Plant Dispersal, metapopulation, Self-Fertilization, colonization, migration, Biological Evolution, self-compatibility, Baker's law, selfing, dispersal, reproductive assurance, inbreeding depression
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
