
pmid: 21476997
This paper presents two experiments where participants had to approximate function values at various generalization points of a square, using given function values at a small set of data points. A representative set of standard function approximation models was trained to exactly fit the function values at data points, and models’ responses at generalization points were compared to those of humans. Then one defined a large class of possible models (including the best two identified predictors) and the class maximal possible prediction accuracy was evaluated. A new model of quick multivariate function approximation belonging to this class was proposed. Its prediction accuracy was close to the maximum possible, and significantly better than that of all other models tested. The new model also provided a significant account of human response variability. Finally, it was shown that this model is more particularly suitable for problems in which the visual system can perform some specific structuring of the data space. This model is therefore considered as a suitable starting point for further investigations into quick multivariate function approximation, which is to date an inadequately explored question in cognitive psychology.
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cognitive psychology, Data Interpretation, Statistical, [SCCO.PSYC] Cognitive science/Psychology, Visual Perception, Humans, Measurement and performance in psychology, Female, Psychomotor Performance, Applications of statistics to psychology
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cognitive psychology, Data Interpretation, Statistical, [SCCO.PSYC] Cognitive science/Psychology, Visual Perception, Humans, Measurement and performance in psychology, Female, Psychomotor Performance, Applications of statistics to psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
