
doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12192
Human‐resource professionals (n = 201) were presented with meta‐analytic validity coefficients associated with unstructured and structured employment interviews. When presented alone, the unstructured interview received a higher effectiveness rating—despite having a smaller validity coefficient—than the structured interview received (d = −.30). When presented together, however, the structured interview was strongly favored (d = .61). The inclusion of the endpoints of the range of operational validities for all selection methods made the presentation‐mode by interview‐structure interaction disappear.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
