
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17224
pmid: 38459661
AbstractWood density is a fundamental property related to tree biomechanics and hydraulic function while playing a crucial role in assessing vegetation carbon stocks by linking volumetric retrieval and a mass estimate. This study provides a high‐resolution map of the global distribution of tree wood density at the 0.01° (~1 km) spatial resolution, derived from four decision trees machine learning models using a global database of 28,822 tree‐level wood density measurements. An ensemble of four top‐performing models combined with eight cross‐validation strategies shows great consistency, providing wood density patterns with pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The global pattern shows lower wood density values in northern and northwestern Europe, Canadian forest regions and slightly higher values in Siberia forests, western United States, and southern China. In contrast, tropical regions, especially wet tropical areas, exhibit high wood density. Climatic predictors explain 49%–63% of spatial variations, followed by vegetation characteristics (25%–31%) and edaphic properties (11%–16%). Notably, leaf type (evergreen vs. deciduous) and leaf habit type (broadleaved vs. needleleaved) are the most dominant individual features among all selected predictive covariates. Wood density tends to be higher for angiosperm broadleaf trees compared to gymnosperm needleleaf trees, particularly for evergreen species. The distributions of wood density categorized by leaf types and leaf habit types have good agreement with the features observed in wood density measurements. This global map quantifying wood density distribution can help improve accurate predictions of forest carbon stocks, providing deeper insights into ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling such as forest vulnerability to hydraulic and thermal stresses in the context of future climate change.
K50 - Technologie des produits forestiers, cycle du carbone, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, Canada, 550, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29554, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28044, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24549, Forests, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_293007aa, physiologie végétale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34363, Machine learning, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666, apprentissage machine, propriété du bois, bois tropical, Ecosystem, 580, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25189, Plant traits, changement climatique, mesure (activité), U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, distribution spatiale, facteur climatique, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49834, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583, Wood, Carbon, Tree physiology, Plant Leaves, séquestration du carbone, carbonisation du bois, Carbon stocks, Climate stresses, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36230, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4668, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_17299, Vegetation resilience, densité du bois
K50 - Technologie des produits forestiers, cycle du carbone, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, Canada, 550, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29554, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28044, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24549, Forests, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_293007aa, physiologie végétale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34363, Machine learning, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666, apprentissage machine, propriété du bois, bois tropical, Ecosystem, 580, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25189, Plant traits, changement climatique, mesure (activité), U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, distribution spatiale, facteur climatique, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49834, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583, Wood, Carbon, Tree physiology, Plant Leaves, séquestration du carbone, carbonisation du bois, Carbon stocks, Climate stresses, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36230, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4668, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_17299, Vegetation resilience, densité du bois
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
