Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Fish and Fisheriesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Fish and Fisheries
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Global distribution of the South American peacock bassesCichlaspp. follows human interference

Authors: Ana Clara Sampaio Franco; Ana Cristina Petry; Marcela Rosa Tavares; Taís de Fátima Ramos Guimarães; Luciano Neves dos Santos;

Global distribution of the South American peacock bassesCichlaspp. follows human interference

Abstract

AbstractSouth American peacock basses (genusCichla) have been widely introduced within and outside the Neotropical region due to their importance to fisheries, despite threats to the native fish fauna. We performed a literature review on the worldwide distribution of validCichlaspecies by focusing on records of species richness and populations in their native and non‐native ranges. We tested for an effect of area, the number of large dams, human population density and gross domestic product as drivers of the distribution of peacock basses across the Freshwater Ecoregions of the World (FEOWs). A total of 544 studies led to 1,289 records of nine species. Their distributions within their native range (19 native FEOWs) were narrower than their distributions in their non‐native range (23 non‐native FEOWs), which encompass tropical and subtropical ecoregions of the Americas, Africa, Southeast Asia and the Pacific islands. Several of these FEOWs harboured more than one species, usuallyC. ocellarisandC. piquiti. Ecoregion areas were positively associated with species richness and population records in native FEOWs, whereas the number of reservoirs was positively related to the records of non‐native populations. These patterns provide further evidence of the role played by reservoirs as the main pathway for the introduction of peacock basses; thus, special attention should be given to the continuous monitoring of the spread of these invaders across watersheds in invaded ecoregions. Considering their broad distribution and the potential for peacock basses to thrive in human‐modified systems, severe damage to the native fish fauna is predicted.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!