
AbstractThe idea of pollination syndromes has been largely discussed but no formal quantitative evaluation has yet been conducted across angiosperms. We present the first systematic review of pollination syndromes that quantitatively tests whether the most effective pollinators for a species can be inferred from suites of floral traits for 417 plant species. Our results support the syndrome concept, indicating that convergent floral evolution is driven by adaptation to the most effective pollinator group. The predictability of pollination syndromes is greater in pollinator‐dependent species and in plants from tropical regions. Many plant species also have secondary pollinators that generally correspond to the ancestral pollinators documented in evolutionary studies. We discuss the utility and limitations of pollination syndromes and the role of secondary pollinators to understand floral ecology and evolution.
Redes de Polinizacion, Geography, Adaptation, Biological, Eficiencia en La Polinizacion, Flowers, Sindrome Floral, Biological Evolution, Floral Evolution, Magnoliopsida, Pollination Networks, Plant Breeding Systems, Species Specificity, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Sistema Reproductivo de Plantas, Evolucion Floral, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Pollination, Symbiosis, Meta Analisis, Phylogeny, Meta-Analysis
Redes de Polinizacion, Geography, Adaptation, Biological, Eficiencia en La Polinizacion, Flowers, Sindrome Floral, Biological Evolution, Floral Evolution, Magnoliopsida, Pollination Networks, Plant Breeding Systems, Species Specificity, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Sistema Reproductivo de Plantas, Evolucion Floral, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Pollination, Symbiosis, Meta Analisis, Phylogeny, Meta-Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 450 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
