
doi: 10.1111/ejn.12847
pmid: 25645363
AbstractThe integration of visual and auditory spatial information is important for building an accurate perception of the external world, but the fundamental mechanisms governing such audiovisual interaction have only partially been resolved. The earliest interface between auditory and visual processing pathways is in the midbrain, where the superior (SC) and inferior colliculi (IC) are reciprocally connected in an audiovisual loop. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of audiovisual interaction in the midbrain by recording neural signals from theSCandICsimultaneously in anesthetized ferrets. Visual stimuli reliably produced band‐limited phase locking ofIClocal field potentials (LFPs) in two distinct frequency bands: 6–10 and 15–30 Hz. These visualLFPresponses co‐localized with robust auditory responses that were characteristic of theIC. Imaginary coherence analysis confirmed that visual responses in theICwere not volume‐conducted signals from the neighboringSC. Visual responses in theICoccurred later than retinally driven superficialSClayers and earlier than deepSClayers that receive indirect visual inputs, suggesting that retinal inputs do not drive visually evoked responses in theIC. In addition,SCandICrecording sites with overlapping visual spatial receptive fields displayed stronger functional connectivity than sites with separate receptive fields, indicating that visual spatial maps are aligned across both midbrain structures. Reciprocal coupling between theICandSCtherefore probably serves the dynamic integration of visual and auditory representations of space.
Neurons, Superior Colliculi, Auditory Pathways, Ferrets, Inferior Colliculi, Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Visual Perception, Animals, Female, Visual Pathways, Photic Stimulation
Neurons, Superior Colliculi, Auditory Pathways, Ferrets, Inferior Colliculi, Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Visual Perception, Animals, Female, Visual Pathways, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
