
Abstract Pairwise likelihood is a limited‐information method widely used to estimate latent variable models, including factor analysis of categorical data. It can often avoid evaluating high‐dimensional integrals and, thus, is computationally more efficient than relying on the full likelihood. Despite its computational advantage, the pairwise likelihood approach can still be demanding for large‐scale problems that involve many observed variables. We tackle this challenge by employing an approximation of the pairwise likelihood estimator, which is derived from an optimization procedure relying on stochastic gradients. The stochastic gradients are constructed by subsampling the pairwise log‐likelihood contributions, for which the subsampling scheme controls the per‐iteration computational complexity. The stochastic estimator is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the pairwise likelihood one. However, finite‐sample performance can be improved by compounding the sampling variability of the data with the uncertainty introduced by the subsampling scheme. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed method using simulation studies and two real data applications.
Stochastic Processes, Likelihood Functions, Models, Statistical, item factor analysis, asymptotic normality; composite likelihood; item factor analysis; stochastic gradient descent; structural equation models, asymptotic normality, composite likelihood, structural equation models, stochastic gradient descent, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Computer Simulation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
Stochastic Processes, Likelihood Functions, Models, Statistical, item factor analysis, asymptotic normality; composite likelihood; item factor analysis; stochastic gradient descent; structural equation models, asymptotic normality, composite likelihood, structural equation models, stochastic gradient descent, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Computer Simulation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
