
doi: 10.1111/avsc.12058
handle: 2268/176923
AbstractQuestionsCan shrub and tree seedlings be reintroduced into an extremely harsh environment through transplantation? Does the growth strategy of species affect their survival? What factors influence transplantation success? Do transplanted species influence their immediate vicinity, e.g. promote native species colonization?LocationCampos Rupestres, Minas Gerais, Brazil.MethodsWe studied the reintroduction of four native tree and 14 native shrub species. Their transplantation success (survival, growth and reproduction) and their impact on their immediate vicinity (understorey composition, soil surface indicators, e.g. cover of moss, biological crust, bare ground, litter, herbaceous cover and soil characteristics) were assessed 4.5 yrs after transplantation.ResultsWhile some transplanted species had low survival (<30%), half of them had survival of >78% 4.5 yrs after transplantation. Plant growth was barely correlated with transplantation success in such a harsh environment. Transplanted species did not influence soil and understorey plant composition but significantly impacted soil surface indicators. The shrub species with higher survival usually allowed establishment of an understorey herbaceous cover, which may increase soil erosion control. This is also true for some species for which the survival was <40%: Diplusodon orbicularis (survival: 39%) and Lavoisiera campos‐portoana (37%). Crown volume had a direct effect on light reaching the soil (e.g. Jacaranda caroba or Collaea cipoensis had a less dense canopy more permeable to light, allowing the development of understorey species). On the other hand, crown volume was positively correlated with amount of litter: Fabaceae, e.g. Chamaecrista semaphora and Mimosa foliolosa, had denser canopy and produced a thick layer of litter, limiting herbaceous species establishment. Three tree species (Enterolobium ellipticum, Kielmeyera petiolaris and Zeyhera tuberculosa) neither had high survival nor facilitated establishment of herbaceous cover. The layout and spacing of species and individuals must thus be considered carefully to ensure recolonization by native shrub and herbaceous species.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the practical efficiency of using some species native to harsh tropical ecosystems, e.g. Campos Rupestres, to restore quarry ecosystems in terms of their transplantation success, effects on both the establishment of herbaceous species and soil conservation.
assessment of restoration success, Sciences de l’environnement & écologie, transplantation success, Cerrado, Life sciences, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, herbaceous understorey, Environmental sciences & ecology, [SDV.EE.ECO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Ecosystems, Sciences du vivant, Serra do Cip o, neotropical mountain grasslands
assessment of restoration success, Sciences de l’environnement & écologie, transplantation success, Cerrado, Life sciences, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, herbaceous understorey, Environmental sciences & ecology, [SDV.EE.ECO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Ecosystems, Sciences du vivant, Serra do Cip o, neotropical mountain grasslands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
