
We propose a hidden Markov model approach for processing seismocardiograms. The seismocardiogram morphology is learned using the expectation-maximization algorithm, and the state of the heart at a given time instant is estimated by the Viterbi algorithm. From the obtained Viterbi sequence, it is then straightforward to estimate instantaneous heart rate, heart rate variability measures, and cardiac time intervals (the latter requiring a small number of manual annotations). As is shown in the conducted experimental study, the presented algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art in seismocardiogram-based heart rate and heart rate variability estimation. Moreover, the isovolumic contraction time and the left ventricular ejection time are estimated with mean absolute errors of about 5 [ms] and [Formula: see text], respectively. The proposed algorithm can be applied to any set of inertial sensors; does not require access to any additional sensor modalities; does not make any assumptions on the seismocardiogram morphology; and explicitly models sensor noise and beat-to-beat variations (both in amplitude and temporal scaling) in the seismocardiogram morphology. As such, it is well suited for low-cost implementations using off-the-shelf inertial sensors and targeting, e.g., at-home medical services.
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, 600, Sensitivity and Specificity, Markov Chains, 004, Pattern Recognition, Automated, vibrations, Ballistocardiography, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Heart Rate Determination, Humans, Computer Simulation, Hidden Markov models, Accelerometers, Estimation, Heart rate variability, Algorithms
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, 600, Sensitivity and Specificity, Markov Chains, 004, Pattern Recognition, Automated, vibrations, Ballistocardiography, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Heart Rate Determination, Humans, Computer Simulation, Hidden Markov models, Accelerometers, Estimation, Heart rate variability, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
