
pmid: 29993473
Classic photometric stereo is often extended to deal with real-world materials and work with unknown lighting conditions for practicability. To quantitatively evaluate non-Lambertian and uncalibrated photometric stereo, a photometric stereo image dataset containing objects of various shapes with complex reflectance properties and high-quality ground truth normals is still missing. In this paper, we introduce the 'DiLiGenT' dataset with calibrated Directional Lightings, objects of General reflectance with different shininess, and 'ground Truth' normals from high-precision laser scanning. We use our dataset to quantitatively evaluate state-of-the-art photometric stereo methods for general materials and unknown lighting conditions, selected from a newly proposed photometric stereo taxonomy emphasizing non-Lambertian and uncalibrated methods. The dataset and evaluation results are made publicly available, and we hope it can serve as a benchmark platform that inspires future research.
Brain modeling, Benchmark testing, 550, Photometric stereo, Shape, Benchmark, 620, Non-Lambertian, Heuristic algorithms, Uncalibrated, Dataset, Taxonomy
Brain modeling, Benchmark testing, 550, Photometric stereo, Shape, Benchmark, 620, Non-Lambertian, Heuristic algorithms, Uncalibrated, Dataset, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 212 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
