
doi: 10.1108/eb017818
Warehousing is a waste of time and money. Goods that are in store are idle goods and the longer they stay in storage the more they cost. The less warehousing, then, the better. A few companies have managed to organise a retailing operation without own warehousing by direct scheduling from manufacturer or supplier to the retail outlet. However, for the vast majority a warehouse is necessary in order to provide a buffer between supply and demand, to take advantage of bulk purchasing and to guarantee a service level to the customer on a reasonable number of products. Clearly, a warehouse should be scientifically sited and designed. It is at the hub of a distribution network and as such must be a highly efficient unit if it is not to wreck the entire system. In previous articles (RDM Jan/Feb and May/June 1974), the authors considered the overall distribution network including the determination of the number of warehouses and their siting. They now consider warehouse design and, more particularly, how this design should be matched to the throughput.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
