
Abstract The recent technological advances underlying the screening of large combinatorial libraries in high-throughput mutational scans deepen our understanding of adaptive protein evolution and boost its applications in protein design. Nevertheless, the large number of possible genotypes requires suitable computational methods for data analysis, the prediction of mutational effects, and the generation of optimized sequences. We describe a computational method that, trained on sequencing samples from multiple rounds of a screening experiment, provides a model of the genotype–fitness relationship. We tested the method on five large-scale mutational scans, yielding accurate predictions of the mutational effects on fitness. The inferred fitness landscape is robust to experimental and sampling noise and exhibits high generalization power in terms of broader sequence space exploration and higher fitness variant predictions. We investigate the role of epistasis and show that the inferred model provides structural information about the 3D contacts in the molecular fold.
Fitness landscape, Direct-coupling analysis, Epistasis, Genetic, Statistical modeling, Computational biology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Evolution, Molecular, Mutation, Methods, Genetic Fitness, Deep mutational scanning, Unsupervised Machine Learning
Fitness landscape, Direct-coupling analysis, Epistasis, Genetic, Statistical modeling, Computational biology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Evolution, Molecular, Mutation, Methods, Genetic Fitness, Deep mutational scanning, Unsupervised Machine Learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
