
arXiv: 1405.3994
handle: 1721.1/98455
We examine the abundance, clustering and metallicity of Damped Lyman-alpha Absorbers (DLAs) in a suite of hydrodynamic cosmological simulations using the moving mesh code AREPO. We incorporate models of supernova and AGN feedback, as well as molecular hydrogen formation. We compare our simulations to the column density distribution function at $z=3$, the total DLA abundance at $z=2-4$, the measured DLA bias at $z=2.3$ and the DLA metallicity distribution at $z=2-4$. Our preferred models produce populations of DLAs in good agreement with most of these observations. The exception is the DLA abundance at $z < 3$, which we show requires stronger feedback in $10^{11-12} \, h^{-1} M_\odot$ mass halos. While the DLA population probes a wide range of halo masses, we find the cross-section is dominated by halos of mass $10^{10} - 10^{11} \, h^{-1} M_\odot$ and virial velocities $50 - 100 \;\mathrm{km/s}$. The simulated DLA population has a linear theory bias of $1.7$, whereas the observations require $2.17 \pm 0.2$. We show that non-linear growth increases the bias in our simulations to $2.3$ at $k=1\; \mathrm{Mpc/}h$, the smallest scale observed. The scale-dependence of the bias is, however, very different in the simulations compared against the observations. We show that, of the observations we consider, the DLA abundance and column density function provide the strongest constraints on the feedback model.
Expansion of the section on the DLA bias and clarifications to the discussion. Accepted by MNRAS. 13 pages, 11 figures
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), FOS: Physical sciences, 5109 Space Sciences, 51 Physical Sciences, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), FOS: Physical sciences, 5109 Space Sciences, 51 Physical Sciences, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 112 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
