
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script> Copyright policy )
 Copyright policy )handle: 10023/24681
ABSTRACT When bars form within galaxy formation simulations in the standard cosmological context, dynamical friction with dark matter (DM) causes them to rotate rather slowly. However, almost all observed galactic bars are fast in terms of the ratio between corotation radius and bar length. Here, we explicitly display an 8σ tension between the observed distribution of this ratio and that in the EAGLE simulation at redshift 0. We also compare the evolution of Newtonian galactic discs embedded in DM haloes to their evolution in three extended gravity theories: Milgromian Dynamics (MOND), a model of non-local gravity, and a scalar–tensor–vector gravity theory (MOG). Although our models start with the same initial baryonic distribution and rotation curve, the long-term evolution is different. The bar instability happens more violently in MOND compared to the other models. There are some common features between the extended gravity models, in particular the negligible role played by dynamical friction − which plays a key role in the DM model. Partly for this reason, all extended gravity models predict weaker bars and faster bar pattern speeds compared to the DM case. Although the absence of strong bars in our idealized, isolated extended gravity simulations is in tension with observations, they reproduce the strong observational preference for ‘fast’ bar pattern speeds, which we could not do with DM. We confirm previous findings that apparently ‘ultrafast’ bars can be due to bar-spiral arm alignment leading to an overestimated bar length, especially in extended gravity scenarios where the bar is already fast.
Galaxies: bar, NDAS, FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), 530, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, [PHYS] Physics [physics], kinematics and dynamics -galaxies, bar -galaxies, QB Astronomy, spiral -instabilities, QC, QB, spiral [Galaxies], bar [Galaxies], Galaxies: evolution, Astronomy and Astrophysics, evolution [Galaxies], Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, evolution -galaxies, QC Physics, Space and Planetary Science, Instabilities, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), gravitation -galaxies, [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], Galaxies: spiral, Gravitation
Galaxies: bar, NDAS, FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), 530, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, [PHYS] Physics [physics], kinematics and dynamics -galaxies, bar -galaxies, QB Astronomy, spiral -instabilities, QC, QB, spiral [Galaxies], bar [Galaxies], Galaxies: evolution, Astronomy and Astrophysics, evolution [Galaxies], Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, evolution -galaxies, QC Physics, Space and Planetary Science, Instabilities, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), gravitation -galaxies, [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], Galaxies: spiral, Gravitation
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | 
