Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Arthropod and Nematode Control with Aldicarb on Florida Citrus

Authors: C. C. Childers; L. W. Duncan; T. A. Wheaton; L. W. Timmer;

Arthropod and Nematode Control with Aldicarb on Florida Citrus

Abstract

Single applications of aldicarb 15 granular (G) at 37 and 75 kg/ha applied to the soil in March or April were compared with a foliar spray program and untreated control trees at four citrus grove locations for 2 yr (1983–84). Arthropod and citrus nematode population levels, tree growth, and fruit yield were monitored. Arthropods that were monitored included Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) mostly on fruit, and Eutetranychus banksi (McGregor), Panonychus citri (McGregor), Dialeurodes citrifolii (Morgan), Lepidosaphes gloveri (Packard), Cornuaspis beckii (Newman), Aonidiella citrina (Coquillett), Coccus viridis (Green), Parlatoria pergandii Cornstock, Saissetia oleae (Olivier), and Ceroplastes floridensis Cornstock on leaves. Plant-parasitic nematodes recovered from soil and root samples were Tylenchulus semipenetrans (Cobb) and Pratylenchus brachyurus (Godfrey) Filipjev & Schuurmans Stekhoven. Aldicarb 15G at both rates provided comparable activity ranging from 13 to 20 wk control of P. oleivora and substantially reduced fruit injury due to russeting. Aldicarb at both rates reduced nematode populations and increased fruit yield at harvest in three of four grove sites.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!