Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forestry An Internat...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A review of the potential for the use of bioherbicides to control forest weeds in the UK

Authors: S. Green;

A review of the potential for the use of bioherbicides to control forest weeds in the UK

Abstract

Summary There are a number of weeds, both native and exotic, which are of considerable economic and ecological importance in UK forestry. These weeds compete with young trees for resources, and suppress their growth in commercial plantations as well as native woodlands. Chemical and cultural control methods are expensive and, in many situations, have not prevented the spread of forest weeds. An alternative, or additional method of weed control, is biological control using bioherbicides. Using this approach, native fungi pathogenic on the target weed are developed and applied inundatively, in a similar manner to that of chemical herbicides. The damage caused by fungi to the weed reduces its impact in young plantations and native habitats. Four important forest weed species in the UK ‐ bracken, bramble, Japanese knotweed and rhododendron ‐ are reviewed here in terms of their biology and impact, current control options and their potential for control using bioherbicides. Despite having a serious impact in forestry, bracken, bramble and Japanese knotweed are not deemed suitable target weeds for the development of a bioherbicide. Considerable effort has already been directed into bioherbicide control of bracken in the UK, without success. Bramble has proved difficult to control using bioherbicides in Canada, and its degree of importance as a forest weed in the UK is probably not as great as for other weeds. Japanese knotweed is already under investigation for biological control using the classical approach, for which it is most suited. Rhododendron, however, is considered a suitable target weed for control using the bioherbicide approach. Of greatest potential is the application of a wood-rotting fungus as a bioherbicide stump treatment for rhododendron ‐ an approach already developed for weedy hardwood species in South Africa, Canada and The Netherlands.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
bronze