
doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn040
When teachers hear the word ‘cohesion’, they usually think of grammatical cohesion—an aspect of cohesion reasonably well covered in student books and teacher materials. However, occupying an area that straddles both lexis ‘proper’ and cohesion lies ‘lexical cohesion’. In what follows, it is argued that the teaching and learning of certain aspects of lexical cohesion is problematic, and that this state of affairs may be behind the current neglect of this subject in EFL materials and classrooms. The paper begins with a brief overview of Halliday and Hasan's (1976) classification of lexical cohesion, and then looks, in turn, at four types of cohesive device. Learners’ uses of these different cohesive ties are discussed, the obstacles to correct usage are noted, and suggestions are made as to how teachers can help students to develop this aspect of their writing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
