Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Population Dynamics of Waterhyacinth and the Biological Control Agent Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at a Southeast Texas Location

Authors: Michael J. Grodowitz; Robert Michael Stewart; Alfred F. Cofrancesco;

Population Dynamics of Waterhyacinth and the Biological Control Agent Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at a Southeast Texas Location

Abstract

Population dynamics of waterhyacinth, Eichhomia crassipes ((Martinus) Solms-Laubach), and a biological control agent, the weevil Neochetina eichhorniae (Warner), were quantified at a site in Wallisville, Tex., during 1987 and 1988. A decline of waterhyacinth occurred that was most pronounced during the 1988 growing season. Changes included decreases in (1) living above water biomass/m2 (≍−57%), (2) living below water biomass/m2 (≍−39%), (3) number of living leaves/plant (≍−50%), and (4) weight/plant (−40%). Associated with these decreases was a 1.5-fold increase in plant density. The waterhyacinth was severely damaged by N. eichhorniae . Highest numbers of N. eichhorniae adults (>55 weevils/m2) occurred in samples collected 15 September 1987. Decreases in the number of weevils for both sexes followed. Declines approached 8 weevils/m2 per month for the following 5 mo. Numbers of pupae per square meter decreased during 1987 by 7.3 pupae/m2 per month. Larval density increased during the winter months with highest larval density noted during December and January. This peak was followed by decreases in third instars of ≍80%. Increases in the number of adults and third instars occurred during the 1988 growing season, however, pupal density remained low (near 0) thereafter. Environmental factors that contributed to the waterhyacinth declines included a drought, nutrient conditions, intermittent freezing temperatures, as well as sustained N. eichhorniae herbivory.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!