
In this paper, we point out some faulty instantiations of threshold ring signatures (TRS) based on the threshold proof-of-knowledge (TPoK) protocol. Although a TRS can be regarded as the non-interactive version of the TPoK, the computational domains of the variables should be carefully chosen. We show that by choosing some inappropriate domains, two such instantiations suffer from forgery and anonymity attacks. Our attacks rely on algebraic techniques which involve solving some particular instances of the well-known subset sum problem. While we focus our attacks on two particular instantiations of the TRS, they are generic and are applicable to other schemes with the same choice of domains or a similar structure. We believe this paper can act as an important security remark on the design of future TRS schemes.
knowledge, Science and Technology Studies, Engineering, faulty, proof, threshold, protocol, signature, instantiations, ring
knowledge, Science and Technology Studies, Engineering, faulty, proof, threshold, protocol, signature, instantiations, ring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
