
doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr024
pmid: 21725085
Food additives are an integral part of the modern food system, but opinion polls showing most Europeans have worries about them imply an urgent need for ethical analysis of their use.The existing literature on food ethics, safety assessment and animal testing.Food additives provide certain advantages in terms of many people's lifestyles.There are disagreements about the appropriate application of the precautionary principle and of the value and ethical validity of animal tests in assessing human safety.Most consumers have a poor understanding of the relative benefits and risks of additives, but concerns over food safety and animal testing remain high.Examining the impacts of food additives on consumer sovereignty, consumer health and on animals used in safety testing should allow a more informed debate about their appropriate uses.
Animal Use Alternatives, Legislation, Food, Food Inspection, Risk Assessment, Consumer Product Safety, Public Opinion, Animals, Humans, Food Additives, Ethical Analysis
Animal Use Alternatives, Legislation, Food, Food Inspection, Risk Assessment, Consumer Product Safety, Public Opinion, Animals, Humans, Food Additives, Ethical Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
