
Abstract In its language policy and planning (LPP), Colombia offers ethnoeducation for ethnic groups, with Spanish as a second language, and for the protection/revitalization of native languages. However, these LPP measures are insufficiently implemented. Meanwhile, with regard to foreign languages, LPP have specifically advocated a Spanish-English bilingualism emphasized since the early 2000s. What then favours English to the detriment of native languages? The objective of this research is to reveal what is hidden behind this LPP through a Critical Discourse Analysis of official documents. The elements brought to light show unilingualism and unibilingualism ideologies that discriminate against native languages, and value the linguistic imperialism of English.
Sociolinguistics, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Foreign Languages, Critical Discourse Analysis, [SCCO.LING] Cognitive science/Linguistics, Minority Languages, Linguistic Ideologies
Sociolinguistics, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Foreign Languages, Critical Discourse Analysis, [SCCO.LING] Cognitive science/Linguistics, Minority Languages, Linguistic Ideologies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
