
For p ∈ [ 1 , ∞ ) p\in [1,\infty ) , we prove that simple, separable, monotracial UHF L p L^{p} -operator algebras are not classifiable up to (complete) isomorphism using countable structures, such as K-theoretic data, as invariants. The same assertion holds even if one only considers UHF L p L^{p} -operator algebras of tensor product type obtained from a diagonal system of similarities. For p = 2 p=2 , it follows that separable nonselfadjoint UHF operator algebras are not classifiable by countable structures up to (complete) isomorphism. Our results, which answer a question of N. Christopher Phillips, rely on Borel complexity theory, and particularly Hjorth’s theory of turbulence.
Lp-operator algebra, nonselfadjoint operator algebra, UHF algebra, Borel complexity, turbulence, Abstract operator algebras on Hilbert spaces, nonselfadjoint operator algebra, turbulence, Mathematics - Operator Algebras, \(K\)-theory and operator algebras (including cyclic theory), Borel complexity, Mathematics - Logic, 47L10, 03E15 (Primary), 47L30 (Secondary), Algebras of operators on Banach spaces and other topological linear spaces, \(L^p\)-operator algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Operator Algebras (math.OA), Logic (math.LO), Descriptive set theory, UHF algebra
Lp-operator algebra, nonselfadjoint operator algebra, UHF algebra, Borel complexity, turbulence, Abstract operator algebras on Hilbert spaces, nonselfadjoint operator algebra, turbulence, Mathematics - Operator Algebras, \(K\)-theory and operator algebras (including cyclic theory), Borel complexity, Mathematics - Logic, 47L10, 03E15 (Primary), 47L30 (Secondary), Algebras of operators on Banach spaces and other topological linear spaces, \(L^p\)-operator algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Operator Algebras (math.OA), Logic (math.LO), Descriptive set theory, UHF algebra
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
