
doi: 10.1090/mcom/3115
handle: 10754/622747
High-order spatial discretizations of hyperbolic PDEs are often designed to have strong stability properties, such as monotonicity. We study explicit multistep Runge–Kutta strong stability preserving (SSP) time integration methods for use with such discretizations. We prove an upper bound on the SSP coefficient of explicit multistep Runge–Kutta methods of order two and above. Numerical optimization is used to find optimized explicit methods of up to five steps, eight stages, and tenth order. These methods are tested on the linear advection and nonlinear Buckley-Leverett equations, and the results for the observed total variation diminishing and/or positivity preserving time-step are presented.
Method of lines for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, multistep Runge-Kutta methods, linear advection, semidiscretization, Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations, stabilty, Buckley-Leverett equations, positivity preserving, variation diminishing, Initial-boundary value problems for second-order hyperbolic equations, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, First-order hyperbolic equations
Method of lines for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, multistep Runge-Kutta methods, linear advection, semidiscretization, Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations, stabilty, Buckley-Leverett equations, positivity preserving, variation diminishing, Initial-boundary value problems for second-order hyperbolic equations, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, First-order hyperbolic equations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
