
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 31335163
pmc: PMC6708275
Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with "abiosignatures" formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the "right" spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.
570, Meridiani-Planum, 550, Extraterrestrial Environment, 1101 Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous), Earth, Planet, Planets, Review Article, Nitrogen-Cycle, Ferric Compounds, Carbon Cycle, 1912 Space and Planetary Science, Building-Blocks, Extremophile., Exobiology, Life Detection, Extraterrestrial life, Minerals, Sedimentary-Rocks, Early Evolution, Uncertainty, Vegetation Patterns, Nitrogen Cycle, Astrobiology, Amino-Acid Synthesis, Taphonomy, Biosignatures, Pongola Supergroup, Carbonate Concretions
570, Meridiani-Planum, 550, Extraterrestrial Environment, 1101 Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous), Earth, Planet, Planets, Review Article, Nitrogen-Cycle, Ferric Compounds, Carbon Cycle, 1912 Space and Planetary Science, Building-Blocks, Extremophile., Exobiology, Life Detection, Extraterrestrial life, Minerals, Sedimentary-Rocks, Early Evolution, Uncertainty, Vegetation Patterns, Nitrogen Cycle, Astrobiology, Amino-Acid Synthesis, Taphonomy, Biosignatures, Pongola Supergroup, Carbonate Concretions
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
