
doi: 10.1086/461016
Decisions on grouping pupils to promote optimum academic growth have occupied much of the school administrator's time. Assumptions about classroom atmosphere, motivation to achieve, and achievement have often been used to support tracking, homogeneous grouping, or other such methods of bringing together children who have supposedly similar learning aptitudes. Despite the many efforts of educators, researchers, and evaluators to substantiate these assumptions, there is no clear-cut relationship between a child's academic gains in school and the group of children with whom he is placed. Reviews of research consistently bear out this fact (1-4). Self-concept and peer acceptance are two of the important issues that have been raised in connection with
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
