Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Mental Habits in Reading

Authors: Agnes Birdsall;

Mental Habits in Reading

Abstract

The problem of retardation in reading has been attacked from various angles. Extreme cases have usually been used for investigation. Diagnosis has been based on objective tests which measure the degree of skill acquired at certain stages of progress. Attempts have been made to understand the causes of deficiencies by the measurement of eye-movements, of perception spans, and of attention factors. The fact still remains that even in the later elementary-school grades some children are retarded in reading, not as a result of congenital word-blindness or mental or perceptual defectiveness, but because of failure to acquire the proper mental habits in reading. The hypothesis of the study described in this article was that these readers are deficient in the mental processes required for forming relationships and associations or for discriminating between meanings. It was expected that, through a comparison of two groups of readers, one group of superior readers and the other of retarded readers, a more complete method and technique of diagnosis might be developed and that, through an analysis of this comparison of performance, further guidance in remedial training might be given. The ensuing material is based on a year's study of two groups of readers in Grade VII of the Tappan Junior High School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, which was made during the school year 1930-31. The chief criterion for division of the pupils in this grade was retardation in reading. Pupils having a reading grade below the standard, 7.0, were placed in Group II; those superior or above the standard, in Group I. The Sangren-Woody Reading Test and the Gates Silent Reading Tests were used to determine reading grades and also to determine the medians for the two groups. At the beginning of the study the reading grade for Group I was 8.8 in the Sangren-Woody test and io.o in the Gates test: for Group II the median was 6.5

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!