<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Thinking Styles and the Big Five Personality Traits

Name: Thinking Styles and the Big Five Personality Traits
Creator: Zhang, LF
Keywords: 4. Education, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 16. Peace & justice, 0503 education, Education

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2002 China (People's Republic of) Publisher:Informa UK LimitedJournal:Educational Psychology, volume 22, pages 17-31 (issn: 0144-3410, eissn: 1469-5820,

Authors: Zhang, LF;

doi: 10.1080/01443410120101224

handle: 10722/42671

Thinking Styles and the Big Five Personality Traits

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between thinking styles and the big five personality traits. One-hundred-and-fifty-four (mean age 20 years) second-year university students from Hong Kong participated in the study. Participants responded to the Thinking Styles Inventory based on Sternberg's theory of mental self-government and to the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, Costa & McCare, 1992). Although significant relationships were identified between particular thinking styles and certain personality traits, it was concluded that it is premature to claim that a personality measure, such as the NEO-FFI can be used to measure thinking styles.

Country

China (People's Republic of)

Related Organizations

University of Hong Kong (香港大學)
China (People's Republic of)
University of Hong Kong
China (People's Republic of)

Keywords

Education

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	66
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%