
This article explores the relevance to teaching and learning practices of recent methodological and interpretive shifts within qualitative and feminist research, from eliciting and analysing narratives of personal 'experience' to attending to the crafting of situated stories or accounts. Drawing on three distinct theoretical frameworks I analyse examples from women's studies and psychology class groups to argue for the value of elaborating both 'experience-close' and 'experience-distant' arenas within teaching and learning contexts. These arenas not only facilitate sites for interrogation of personal-political relations, but also the construction of these relations within specific contexts can be elaborated. By Such means I suggest that innovative and exploratory practice can be supported within academic contexts without posing difficulties of overexposure for either individuals or groups. Further, holding in mind several different models can perhaps help ward off the dynamic of (either attributed or enacted) totalization or coercion potentially associated with a singular commitment to any one approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
