Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Systemati...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Third time lucky? Another substantially revised sectional classification for Australasian Plagiochila (Plagiochilaceae: Jungermanniopsida)

Authors: Matt A. M. Renner; Simon D. F. Patzak; Margaret M. Heslewood; Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp; Jochen Heinrichs;

Third time lucky? Another substantially revised sectional classification for Australasian Plagiochila (Plagiochilaceae: Jungermanniopsida)

Abstract

Molecular phylogeny reconstruction has motivated recircumscription of all families and most genera within the Lophocoleinae, and in Plagiochila, the largest genus of this lineage, has refined the sectional classification as well. Here, we extend this ongoing revision in the first study focusing on species from Australasia, a region to date underrepresented in molecular phylogenetic datasets. We reconstructed a phylogeny containing more than 300 individuals from Australasia and the Pacific, and with this tested sectional circumscriptions within the two largely contradictory classifications recently proposed for Plagiochila. Neither scheme satisfactorily captures relationships among species and all sections prove paraphyletic or polyphyletic, with the exception of those defying these properties by virtue of containing only one species. We propose expanding the circumscription of several sections as the best option for achieving a revised classification representing monophyla that remains stable over the short to medium term, given current knowledge. Broader circumscriptions are proposed for section Denticulatae with section Tayloriae as a new synonym; section Arrectae with section Caducifoliae as a new synonym; a reinstated section Deflexifoliae; and section Plagiochila, to include P. trapezoidea; section Belangerianae to include sections Annotinae, Mitteniae and Strombifoliae as new synonyms; and section Durae with section Colensoae as a new synonym. Section Fragmentissimae is applied to the lineage previously named section Deltoideae nom. inval. or section Hodgsoniae nom. inval., as the Tasmanian P. ratkowskiana and New Zealand P. fragmentissima are the same, and sister to other species in the lineage containing P. deltoidea. Morphological characters supporting these groups are identified, but more importantly the proposed revisions provide a robust framework on which informed re-examination of morphology within this variable and species-rich genus can proceed, and we introduce some encouraging avenues in this area.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!