Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

δ13 Values of C4 Types in Grasses

Authors: PW Hattersley;

δ13 Values of C4 Types in Grasses

Abstract

δ13 values were determined for leaves of C4 grasses (Poaceae) of different photosynthetic types. For plants grown in the same environment at the same time, mean δ13 values for the three C4 types were: NADP-ME-type, - 11.350 ± 0.13 s.e. (11 spp.); PCK-type, - 11.950 ± 0.19 s.e. (11 spp.); and NAD-ME-type, -12.70 ± 0.21 s.e. (9 spp.). Although there is some overlap between the values for individual species of the three groups, the difference between any two means is highly significant [P(t) < 0.01] and is not due to taxonomic sampling bias at the subfamily level. The differences in means may suggest that C4 types differ in rates of leakage of CO2 and HCO3- from PCR tissue ('photosynthetic carbon reduction' tissue: equivalent to 'Kranz' tissue), and/or, using Farquhar's (Appendix) expression for plant δ values, that C4 types differ in their average intercellular CO2 concentrations (c1). It is also possible that differences between C4 types exist in some other, unknown, leaf fractionation process. Apoplastic CO2 leakage from PCR tissue in NAD-ME-type C4 grasses, which do not possess a PCR 'suberized lamella' as found in NADP-ME- type and PCK-type C4 grasses, may give these species the most negative δ13 values. Expressions for C4 plant δ13 values, and a model for the δ13 values of CO2 and HCO3- in various pools and fluxes in C4 plant leaves, are given.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    94
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
94
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!