Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Establishment, growth and persistence of greater lotus (Lotus uliginosus) at six sites in eastern Australia

Authors: M. J. Blumenthal; A. M. Bowman; A. Cole; R. M. Jones; W. M. Kelman; T. E. Launders; H. I. Nicol;

Establishment, growth and persistence of greater lotus (Lotus uliginosus) at six sites in eastern Australia

Abstract

Summary. Three Lotus uliginosus populations, cv. Maku, Sharnae and the line G4704 were compared to Trifolium repens cv. Haifa on the basis of plant frequency and contribution to total above ground biomass production at 6 sites in eastern Australia (Samford, Grafton, Taree, Nowra, Moss Vale and Warragul). In addition, L. uliginosus G4703 was sown at Nowra and L. corniculatus (L.) cv. Grasslands Goldie was sown at Taree. At each site populations were sown with a grass; Setaria sphacelata cv. Narok at Samford, Grafton and Taree; Lolium perenne cv. Kangaroo Valley at Nowra and Moss Vale and cv. Ellett at Warragul. Grasslands Maku and the sown grasses were also sown alone at each site. Each of the pasture treatments was sown either with 500 kg/ha single superphosphate or without superphosphate (or with small amounts of P, if available soil Bray P The main findings were that: (i) superphosphate had little effect on lotus frequency and biomass after the first few harvests; (ii) Haifa white clover was the most successful legume in terms of plant frequency and contribution to total biomass at the subtropical sites (Taree, Grafton and Samford); (iii) Haifa was the most successful legume in the establishment year at the temperate sites, but lotus became dominant in subsequent years; (iv) Grasslands Maku was the superior greater lotus population in terms of frequency and contribution to total biomass production at all sites; and (v) at Taree, the one site where L. corniculatus cv. Grasslands Goldie was included, it was the superior population.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!