Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
UQ eSpace
Article . 1989
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 1989
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Prediction of the commercial yield of beef from carcasses destined for the Japanese market by using measurements from the carcass and non-carcass parts

Authors: Johnson, E. R.; Ball, B.;

Prediction of the commercial yield of beef from carcasses destined for the Japanese market by using measurements from the carcass and non-carcass parts

Abstract

Yield of saleable beef was predicted in 4 genotypes of bullocks (Hereford, Brahman, Brahman x Hereford and Simmental x Hereford). Simple and multiple regression equations were used to determine how well 4 fat thickness measurements (12th rib and rump measurements SC3 SC5 and SC7) individually, with or without the inclusion of hot side weight, foreshanks weight and short cut tongue weight predicted the yields of saleable beef. Each of the 4 fat thickness measurements (alone) predicted percentage yield of saleable beef with low r.s.d.'s at the means. The regression coefficients for the 4 fat thickness measuring sites were negative and significant in the Hereford, Brahman and Brahman x Hereford groups. In the Simmental x Hereford cattle, the regression coefficients for the rump sites (SC3, SC5 and SC7) were positive but significant only in SC5 which had the lowest r.s.d. (1.56%) of all sites. Twelfth rib fat thickness, with a common regression coefficient for all 4 genotypes (P<0.01) and an r.s.d. of 1.81%, was the next most useful fat thickness measurement. The addition of hot side weight improved the prediction of percentage saleable beef yield at the SC3 and SC5 sites, but not in the pure-bred Brahman bullocks. For populations that include British, European and Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, SC5 fat thickness (alone) was the best determinant of percentage yield of saleable beef. Neither quadratic analyses nor the addition of foreshanks weight or short-cut tongue weight to the fat thickness measurements improved the accuracy of linear regression in any of the 4 genotypes. The errors in prediction of percentage yield of saleable beef (0.28-0.67%) attributable to incorrect rump site location (of up to 4.0 cm) are unlikely to jeopardise the commercial value of yield of saleable beef predicted from measurements made on the rump. Whilst the Brahman and Brahman x Hereford cattle produced high-yielding carcasses for the Japanese chilled beef market and the Simmental x Hereford cattle, by judicious management could equal this yield, carcass yields of the Hereford cattle were about 4-5% lower at all levels of fat thickness. The ability of Hereford cattle to satisfy this market, economically, is seriously questioned.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 630

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!