
pmid: 11559012
This paper describes the development and evaluation of a series of computer assisted learning (CAL) packages on cell biology produced for an undergraduate nursing course. The CAL packages were based on the material originally delivered in Kindermann's slide practical classes. The decision to convert this teaching material into CAL packages was taken for a number of reasons, but mainly in response to student evaluations and lack of equipment and staff resources needed to adequately deliver the sessions. Student feedback showed that CAL was preferred to the slide classes. Two studies were carried out to compare the CAL method of delivery with the conventional method using an experimental design. Students taught using CAL felt more confident that they would be able to use the material they had learnt if required as a basis for future work. The distributions rating 'how necessary was the contribution of a teacher in the session' were skewed towards the 'essential' end of the scale for the slide group but towards the 'unnecessary' end for the CAL group. Learning effectiveness was not compromised by the introduction of CAL, even though this meant that no lecturer was on hand to deal with questions.
Cohort Studies, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Education, Nursing, Biological Science Disciplines, Computer-Assisted Instruction
Cohort Studies, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Education, Nursing, Biological Science Disciplines, Computer-Assisted Instruction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
