
Chapter 2 presents an interesting and detailed analysis of the psychology behind our choice of foods, and provides an explanation as to why our reactions to “rationally” presented evidence does not always align with the expectations of scientists and policy makers. It appears that our sensitivity to the use of new technologies in producing our food is particularly heightened, and despite the intuitive appeal of all the benefits offered by nanotechnology, the new technology will not receive our automatic acceptance. The chapter also discusses the challenges for the food processing sector and the potential approaches that could be used to assess and inform attitudes. It is evident that effective research and development strategies for this new technology will need to encompass the consumer psychology if this technology is to fulfil its potential. Public engagement and informed dialogue are the key if we are to avoid the furore that has dogged the introduction of other new technologies in recent years such as food irradiation or genetic modification (GM).
Life Science
Life Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
