
AbstractQuality control of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be performed by several methods. These methods are usually relatively labor-intensive, difficult to standardize, or they do not facilitate reliable quantification. Here, we describe a biomarker to distinguish between pluripotent and non-pluripotent cells based on DNA methylation (DNAm) levels at only three specific CpG sites. Two of these CpG sites were selected by their discriminatory power in 258 DNAm profiles – they were either methylated in pluripotent or non-pluripotent cells. The difference between these two β-values provides an Epi-Pluri-Score that was validated on independent DNAm-datasets (264 pluripotent and 1,951 non-pluripotent samples) with 99.9% specificity and 98.9% sensitivity. This score was complemented by a third CpG within the gene POU5F1 (OCT4), which better demarcates early differentiation events. We established pyrosequencing assays for the three relevant CpG sites and thereby correctly classified DNA of 12 pluripotent cell lines and 31 non-pluripotent cell lines. Furthermore, DNAm changes at these three CpGs were tracked in the course of differentiation of iPSCs towards mesenchymal stromal cells. The Epi-Pluri-Score does not give information on lineage-specific differentiation potential, but it provides a simple, reliable and robust biomarker to support high-throughput classification into either pluripotent or non-pluripotent cells.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, Cultured, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, 000, Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, DNA Methylation, Article, Cell Line, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genetic, Humans, CpG Islands, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Biomarkers, Cells, Cultured, Epigenesis
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, Cultured, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, 000, Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, DNA Methylation, Article, Cell Line, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genetic, Humans, CpG Islands, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Biomarkers, Cells, Cultured, Epigenesis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
