Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics
Copyright policy )NSERC| unidentified
Stephan, Paula; Veugelers, Reinhilde; Wang, Jian;
Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics
Science panels still rely on poor proxies to judge quality and impact. That results in risk-averse research, say Paula Stephan, Reinhilde Veugelers and Jian Wang.
United Kingdom
- Georgia State University United States
- Lancaster University United Kingdom
- KU Leuven Belgium
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Belgium
Bibliometrics, Periodicals as Topic
Bibliometrics, Periodicals as Topic
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).159 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP! 159
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 1%
bronze
